“How can we know that the Bible was changed by, or even originally written by, the nefarious Powers-That-Shouldn’t-Be?” “How do we know it isn’t just another oppressive control mechanism?”

I get asked this question CONSTANTLY. And while I have addressed it numerous times, in numerous videos, I found this video by one of my favorite researchers of all time, Chris White, who succinctly and comprehensively addresses this very same question. In ten minutes no less…

source

50 COMMENTS

  1. i dont think the illuminati would've changed the bible.. i think they made a whole different book with some context of the true book but keep the real book hidden somewhere.. maybe in Alaska cause why can't we go there but any other place in the world we can travel. plus did u guys know that demons actually love cold weather??

  3. what does that got to do with the SUPERNATURAL BIBLE CHANGES STARTING WITH LUKE 17 34 ?never said two MEN!!! u 2 just say two WORD;' WORD DOUBLE WORD DONT YOU SEE THAT !!!!!!!! ITS GONA BE HARD TO PREACH ABOUT THAT ONE ALONE

  7. I will ask the Father and he will send the Holy Spirit the comforter who will lead you and guide you in all truth.

    God is love, not religious.

    If the Son sets you free you are free indeed.

    I will write my words on your heart. Love is peace and religion is bondage.
    Test the spirit to se if it’s of God

  11. I kno h Bible is true and correct! But what I do not like is the Catholic church removing whole books from the Bible to put forth their own version of history! Some of the most important books are the book of Enoch and Jasher! Who told the Catholic church to remove any books mire than once!! The books that were removed are still in the Ethiopian Bible! That Bible has been un-touched for hundreds of' years! This nonsense about "extra biblical text" is a way of getting tou to second guess the Bible! Also it was the Catholic church who "cannonize" the current Bible! I trust the Bible, but juat know the real Bible is more than 66' book, and the Catholic church had no right to remove any books!!

  15. THE HOLY BIBLE IS REALLY AMAZING 📚📖📚.!!!! . EVERY TIME I STUDY 📖 IT , I COME UP WITH NEW IDEAS .!!!!! .NO WONDER THE ZONIST , AND DEMONS .!!!!! . HATE IT .!!!!! .IT EX PROSES , THERE PLANS .!!!!! .AGANST US .!!!!! .STUDY IT . I LIKE THE KJV . !!!🙏🏾👍💕🙏🏾…..BE ADVICE , THE ZONIST , WANT TO BAN IT , AS OFFENSIVE SPEECH ..!!!!!!! .💔…..

  16. How can you prove something that is super natural?….RESEARCH some of the changes that are being noticed by those who know it. I admire your love of Jesus and agree with most of what you talk about. I watched aethereal 50x already. Love it. But my brother you are witnessing the lying signs and wonders of Satan..the grammar and meaning of the kjv is foreign to those who know it. Bottles….matrix..unicorns…etc….I shall pray for you that God will open your eyes to this truth. God bless you brother.

  19. It is funny and the comment section make it funnier.
    ”We are the Christ. Lower your knees and surrender your souls. We will add your body and your soul to our Lord. Your culture will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile.”

  23. Re Jesus:
    There are also several secular records that He indeed existed, crucified with strange darkness/earthquake and the stories about Him being the Messiah, His resurrection/miracles done:

    Tacitus and Josephus

    ".. [N]o pagans and Jews who opposed Christianity denied Jesus’ historicity or even questioned it.”

    https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/people-cultures-in-the-bible/jesus-historical-jesus/did-jesus-exist/

    Thallus (52AD)

    Earliest secular writer to mention Jesus…

    Jesus lived, crucified, and there was an earthquake and darkness at the point of His crucifixion.

    Tacitus

    … confirms several historical elements of the Biblical narrative: Jesus lived in Judea, was crucified under Pontius Pilate, and had followers who were persecuted for their faith in Christ.

    Mara Bar-Serapion (70AD)

    He was a wise and influential man who died for His beliefs…Jewish leadership was somehow responsible for Jesus’ death. Jesus’ followers adopted His beliefs and lived their lives accordingly.

    Phlegon (80-140AD)

    Jesus had the ability to accurately predict the future, was crucified under the reign of Tiberius Caesar and demonstrated His wounds after he was (allegedly) resurrected.

    Pliny the Younger (61-113AD)

    The first Christians believed Jesus was GOD, upheld a high moral code, and ..met regularly to worship Jesus.

    Suetonius (69-140AD)

    Jesus had a curious and immediate impact on His followers, empowering them to die courageously for what they knew to be true.

    Lucian of Samosata: (115-200 A.D.)

    He taught about repentance and about the family of God.

    Celsus (175AD)

    Jesus had an earthly father who was a carpenter, possessed unusual magical powers and claimed to be God.

    http://coldcasechristianity.com/2017/is-there-any-evidence-for-jesus-outside-the-bible/

  24. Re New Testament/Jesus, there are many Old Testament scriptures about the details of Jesus – 1000 yrs or so before that He fulfilled. No other religion can claim things like that. 
    Isaiah 52, 53 – born of a virgin – Isaiah 7:14. birthplace Bethlehem – Micah 5:2; enter Jerusalem on donkey as crowd shouted “Hosanna” – Zechariah 9:9-10; Psalms 118:25-26;12:13; betrayed- Psalms 69:25; side pierced – Zechariah 12:10, suffer vicariously for the sins of the world – Isaiah 53:6, 9, 12; killed with the “wicked” ones 2 thieves) yet he would be buried with the rich (a rich man's tomb) – Isaiah 53:9; killed – Daniel 9:26; description of crucifixion – Psalms 22; resurrection – Psalms 16:10; gifts from "Wise Men" (kings) – Psalms 72:10; Savior Psalms 72

  25. The things that were changed mentioned in comments aren't "salvation issues" which is the goal for the whole thing. There's enough in the Old (prophecies) to prove the New Testament events and what needed to be proven – who Jesus was and His resurrection. That's what Christianity is based upon. As shown here, it wasn't the ancient scriptures that were false, it was Catholicism with the false interpretations that was used to lead people astray but wasn't to "control" the people better. That doesn't even make sense.
    But even they agreed about Jesus, crucifixion, resurrection for our sins…and then the lists of what were considered sins not to commit, with the Holy Spirit's help. There are some misinterpretations of some, like homosexuality but that hasn't been changed – it just takes common sense and reading, ignoring what others have said and accepting it, whether you like or agree or not. All the denominations are caused by man's ego, ignorance, human nature & such – it's not because the scriptures were changed…
    that's an excuse to use.

  26. Look into the counter reformation of the Catholic church. Maybe they CHANGED the text. Modern versions omit and add to and are based on critical text. They bring doubt not faith. They have been incrementally changed over a long span of time. Please see the ex Jesuit priest and David Daniel's. Look at New Age Bible versions by Gail Riplinger. Or Why the King James by Sam Gipp.

  28. No. It has not been changed. Examination of the oldest through to the most recent copies of the texts proves it.

    Complete New Testament Manuscripts by century:
    2nd Century: 12
    3rd Century: 61
    4th Century: 121
    5th Cenutry: 179
    6th Century: 258
    7th Century: 302
    8th Century: 370
    9th Century: 585
    10th Century: 967

    There are more than 24,000 partial and complete manuscript copies of the New Testament: 1. over 5,500 Greek manuscripts 2. over 10,000 Latin Vulgate manuscripts 3. at least 9,300 other early versions (e.g. Ethiopic, Slavic, Armenian, Arabic) Additional sources include: 1. approximately 86,000 scripture quotations in the writings of early church leaders 2. approximately seven thousand Lectionaries (church-service books) used in the early centuries of Christianity which contain scripture quotations from which it is possible to reproduce the entire New Testament many times over.

  31. If one word is changed than that hole scripture be bind . Allen Gleason 1883 with the evidence for his map for the Queen's navy . Proves more than once the new testament has scripture change from original text . Their for the old testament is true , the new a lie .

  32. yes the Vatican did change the wording…yes the Jehovah witness changed the text. yes the NASB, The RSV, Yes the ESV, Yes the MESSAGE also, all have changed the wording and removed certain scriptures and verses. look it up, expose the false translations!!!

  33. Yes someone did,, look at the different conversions… why was the word sodomy removed from new versions? the Bible has been changed! do a little research about the New Iniquity Version that was converted by the homosexual agenda,, then many followed, even the hebrew version is corrupted. the only version, after ALL my research that has maintained the POWER of the scriptures is the KJV 1611…

  34. I tried searching for this video on Youtube by typing the title into the search bar and it was way down on the list. There were many godless engineer videos and other false teaching videos to scroll through. However, after finding it, I was given the error message and it didn't play right away. It worked after refreshing it, but wouldn't play automatically like all videos do.

  40. Why does the bible say "god" instead of I am … And ::lord is no name for I Am … Why would they put these titles in the bible instead of His Name Which is powerful …Moreover , how can an enemy disarm the peasants , by removing the name of I Am in which through out the Scriptures He very serious about … Does I Am look at the heart ? Absolutely … Bur remember the WORD says the whole world with be deceived …

  43. I'm sorry dear brother I disagree. Of the thousands of NT manuscripts none agree perfectly. I understand that many of the differences are just spelling variations in the Greek but when one looks deeper into the matter a whole new world of Truth emerges! I will continue later, my apologies.

  47. Hey I love your work. The only thing that has me questioning versions of scripture are the NAMES. some names were changed other were not so this can't be ecplained by translation from Greek or hebrew. Because again some names were and othere were not. I have decided this was intentionally done. But not by groups trying to control us but to PROTECT them. Im not hung up on translation I just want the TRUTH and a real relationship with my FATHER. I love your work keep it up ☝.
    YOUR TEACHING
    IS NO ACCIDENT!

  50. Seems to me the critics haven't done their homework about what criteria they used when putting together and deliberately leaving out things like a lot that was discarded was not anything different and/or was provably heretical to rest of scriptures. There were many, many other manuscripts from pagan belief systems that were just made up & obviously from the demonic realm. The popular Gnostic ones are a great example. Re New Testament, there are many Old Testament scriptures about the details of Jesus – 1000 yrs. before that He fulfilled. No other religion can say things like that.

    Isaiah 52, 53 – born of a virgin – Isaiah 7:14. birthplace Bethlehem – Micah 5:2; enter Jerusalem on donkey as crowd shouted “Hosanna” – Zechariah 9:9-10; Psalms 118:25-26;12:13; betrayed- Psalms 69:25; side pierced – Zechariah 12:10, suffer vicariously for the sins of the world – Isaiah 53:6, 9, 12; killed with the “wicked” ones 2 thieves) yet he would be buried with the rich (a rich man's tomb) – Isaiah 53:9; killed – Daniel 9:26; description of crucifixion – Psalms 22; resurrection – Psalms 16:10; gifts from "Wise Men" (kings) – Psalms 72:10; Savior Psalms 72

    Plus I would think God would preserve such important information. As for other books like Enoch — it doesn't contain anything different re our salvation that we need so no big deal. Many trust it for more detailed, additional info about other issues though only because our Bible refers to him and he prophesies about Jesus also. (But that's only 1 Enoch – other books named Enoch are not "inspired" because they are contradictory & written in the first centuries)
    I agree also about how it's common sense that they would NOT want people to live as instructed in the Bible for "control" – it was just the opposite. Both authorities and most of the Jews were against Christianity.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here